Does it bother you to play a game on a different system for which it was intended?" and 2.Super Mario All-Stars is a 1993 compilation of platform games for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System (SNES). Thus, your overall enjoyment of "Super Mario All Stars" will likely come down to two factors: 1. original with almost no damage, but I could barely even make a dent in this one. It looks great and feels like a classic Mario game, but good luck getting anywhere past the first couple of levels. Lost Levels: The trouble here is that Lost Levels is just too doggone difficult (the reason why the strange Mario 2 exists in the first place, as game distributors correctly evaluated it as much too hard for U.S. I know some people really enjoy it, by I always skipped this one because I thought it wasn't as good as the traditional Mario setup. It is completely different (pulling up plants and throwing them?!) than any other Mario game. Mario 2: This is just a strange game to begin with. It plays okay on the SNES, but it loses some of that atmosphere. However, I've always felt that game was meant to be played on the original NES with the two-button control. Mario 1: A faithful re-creation of the iconic original. It is the only game that doesn't feel like a "port", and it is the best all-around Mario game maybe ever (Mario '64 may give it a run). Mario 3: 95% percent of my time playing "All Stars" was spent playing this game, as it is the one that easily translates the best from NES to SNES.
Wow! While the concept it a great one, the trouble I've always found with this collection comes from the individual games themselves.
Put together all the Mario games (at least to that point) on a single cartridge and allow players to SAVE their progress. The idea behind "Super Mario All Stars" for the Super Nintendo is a great one.
0 kommentar(er)
